Teacher/Mentor Evaluation
Iowa Regional Future City Competition
Please take a few moments to provide feedback about your experience for this year's competition. After completing the form, click on the submit button below to send in your response.
1. How did you get involved with the Future City Program? A parent/student A teacher/co-worker Returning from previous year Assigned Website Information Packet ITAG or other Conference Other
---- Materials/Training ----
2. I found the software: User Friendly Usable after initial learning curve Very difficult to use Complete mystery
3. I referred to the handbook: Daily Weekly Monthly Never read it
a. I used its lesson plans/activities: Daily Weekly Monthly Never
b. I found the handbook: Very Useful Useful Somewhat Useful Not Useful at all
4. I referred to the Tutorial CD: Daily Weekly Monthly Never used it
5. I attended a teacher/mentor (ICN) orientation: Yes No
a. The orientation was: Very Helpful Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at all I did not attend
b. The most helpful topic discussed was:
c. A topic not covered but needed was:
d. The best day & time for an orientation is: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday or Sunday starting anytime between: 7AM to 9AM 9AM to 12 Noon 12 Noon to 4 PM 4PM to 6PM After 6PM
6. I visited the Iowa Regional Future City website www.futurecityiowa.org : Daily Weekly Monthly Never Accessed it
a. I found the website: Very Helpful Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at all I did not access it
b. I would recommend posting information about:
---- Mentor/Teacher ----
7. Our mentor/teacher was: Very Helpful Helpful Somewhat Helpful Not Helpful at all Our Team did not have one
a. Met with the students: Daily Weekly Monthly Never
b. Was a good source of information: Often Occasionally A few times Never
c. Helped the students work through challenges: Often Occasionally A few times Never
d. Other ways the mentor/teacher was helpful:
e. Suggestions for next year:
---- The FCC Program ----
8. Most difficult aspect of the program for me was:
9. Most fulfilling aspect of the program for me was:
10. I plan to participate next year: Yes No Not sure
11. I had students and/or teams that dropped out during the competition: Yes No Not Sure
a. The main reason students dropped out:
b. Suggestions on how we can involve/retain more students:
---- Submittals (Computer file, Essay & Abstract) ----
12. The submittal process was: I was not involved Very Easy Easy OK Difficult Very Difficult
13. I prefer to submit via: E-Mail Website Mail Fax Drop-off Other
14. The deadlines were: Fair Challenging but Fair Difficult to meet Impossible to meet
15. Suggestion(s) for next year:
---- Competition Day ----
16. The competition location/facility was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
17. The registration process was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
18. The competition schedule was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
19. The flow of information to the competitors was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
20. The concept of special awards was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
21. The amount of school recognition was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
22. The quality of judges was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
23. Other comments:
---- Overall Rating ----
24. Overall the Future City Competition experience was: Excellent Good Adequate Poor
The optional fields below are primarily for Mentors. We do not have accurate information in our database regarding Mentors for each school and would appreciate if you would fill out this information so that we can include you in future group emails. Thank You for your feedback!
25. OPTIONAL - Name:
26. OPTIONAL - Email Address:
Click the "Submit" button below to send...